Foundations of Reflective Practice in Mental Health
1.1 Defining Professional Reflection
( Blog Entry1) Omozee.
First, in order to embark on this journey, `I needed to know
what professional reflection is. It is far beyond reminiscing of the day.
According to Jasper (2013), it is one of the main professional skills, an
organised approach to viewing our practice in order to be able to learn through
it and improve. It is not a passive process but an active and disciplined
process. Maintaining our competence and practise safely for our patients is our
responsibility. Bulman, Lathlean, and
Gobbi (2012) found that students and teachers use reflection to learn new things
and grasp tough situations. In mental
health, where things are complicated, it's important to relate our feelings and
information. Writing things down like we
did in our blog is a strong way to do this.
Reflective journaling helps students bridge the gap between classroom
theory and chaotic placement practice, according to Epp (2012). It avoids theory as words and helps us
observe how it works with a service user.
1.2 Selecting a Reflective Framework
A formal model is required in order to prevent reflection as
a haphazard set of thoughts. Such models provide our minds with a coherent
structure. To travel to my destination, I have decided to apply the
Experiential Learning Cycle developed by Kolb (2015). Although other models
such as the framework of critical reflection used by Fook and Gardner (2013) do
a great job of breaking down social and power problems, the model by Kolb is
highly effective in transforming one experience into future action. It consists
of four distinct phases, which I have summarised in the table below. This cycle
demonstrates that we cannot simply experience something and we have to see how
we contribute to it, reflect on its meaning and make plans to behave
differently in the future.
Figure 1 Kolb's Reflective Cycle (Kolb,
2014)
|
Kolb's (2015) Four-Stage Cycle |
What it means in practice |
|
1.
Concrete Experience |
What actually happened? (The event) |
|
2.
Reflective Observation |
What did I feel and notice? (My reaction) |
|
3.
Abstract Conceptualisation |
What can I learn from this? (The
theory) |
|
4.
Active Experimentation |
What will I do differently next time? (The plan) |
1.3 Reflective Application: An Incident in Mental
Health Practice
I will now use the cycle to an incident I had experienced as
suggested by Kolb (2015).
(1. Concrete Experience) The situation occurred on a
busy ward. A service user, 'Mr. A', got agitated with regards to his medication
and felt neglected. He began pacing and his voice increased in volume. I was
the first to respond. I attempted to reason with him by saying to him to lower
his voice and that it would be sorted soon. This made him more agitated. Then
one of the senior colleagues intervened. She sat near him (distantly) and
simply requested him to tell her about his frustration. She heard and the
situation diffused.
(2. Reflective Observation) I watched this and was
ashamed of how I was contributing to the situation. My general supposition was
that Mr. The issue was that A was agitated, and it had to be prevented in the
interest of the ward. My colleague appeared to interpret the agitation as an
effect of the problem: Mr. The helplessness of A. I was concentrated on the
concept of control, whereas she was concentrated on the concept of
understanding. I realised that my priority was the routine of the ward whereas
his was his health.
(3. Abstract Conceptualisation) Reflecting on this, I
can imagine how my actions were counterproductive. I was more of a give-orders
person, rather than an empathetic one. This relates to person-centred care,
which I had heard about, but had not put into practice. I had treated Mr. Not
as a person with an authentic anxiety, but as an interruption. The moral of the
story here is that de-escalation is not about telling commands, it is about
justifying emotions. My colleague gave Mr. Listening gave him a feeling of
control, which enabled him to regain his own sense of control.
(4. Active Experimentation) I would now approach my
future practice in a totally different way. The next time I will stop briefly
to deal with my own defence mechanism. I will then listen, not talk. Active
listening skills, such as summarising his concerns (So, you feel ignored...),
will be used to demonstrate to him that I have heard him. I will attempt to
take my seat, when safe, to demonstrate that I am no danger. I will not only
aim at stopping the noise but to discover what is the cause of the distress.
The Omozee reflection has successfully applied the learning cycle by Kolb to a real-life happening in mental health practice, with both personal and professional development being present. It shows how a control-oriented reaction is substituted with a person-oriented and sympathetic attitude. The author cleverly points out the way in which their response to the situation in the beginning intensified the tension and compares it to a de-escalation strategy demonstrated by a senior colleague. The reflection has addressed the significance of active listening, emotional empathy and self-awareness in encouraging effective mental health care. In general, this demonstrates a high level of critical reflection and future learning practice.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteYour reflection demonstrates a clear understanding of professional reflection as a structured skill.
ReplyDeleteOmozee reflection show us a clear understanding on professional reflection skills
ReplyDelete